A Review Of case law on mortgage slideshare
A Review Of case law on mortgage slideshare
Blog Article
nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to your offender and also the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Tiny fees use.
As being the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Ordinarily, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (including These in clear violation of established case regulation) to your higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, along with the case isn't appealed, the decision will stand.
Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner must go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these types of an appeal has not however been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may perhaps then seek out further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Since the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing for the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
Quite a few judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in placing the Petitioner's name to the ECL based within the criminal case are inconsistent with established legal principles. As a result, this petition must be allowed Read more
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's properly-settled that when thinking of the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority more info needs to think about the advantage of many of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of eligible candidates who are found being most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded from the respondent department just to extend favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part on the respondent department.
12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons getting their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to do absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits may be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These include things like if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set from the government.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe for a foster child. Even though the few experienced two youthful children of their have at home, the social worker did not convey to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report into the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement while in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had young children.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may very well be 1 or more judgments offered (or reported). Only the reason to the decision from the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted in an argument.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.